SafetyLitigation.com
content top

Failure To Amend Insurance Coverage Disclosures Found Sanctionable

On Friday, the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin granted a motion for sanctions against attorneys representing the manufacturer of a catwalk from which an egg farm worker fell and was seriously injured.  At the beginning of the case, the attorneys made the following initial disclosure about available insurance coverage from the company’s German insurer:...

Expect Heightened Scrutiny Of Worker Relationships For Possible “Joint Employment”

The scenarios in which a worker, even though not technically a company employee, is found to be a company employee under a theory of “joint employment” for purposes of various laws continues to increase.  Yesterday, the U.S. Department of Labor’s Wage and Hour Division issued an Administrator’s Interpretation establishing new standards for determining joint...

Primary Insurer Wins Reinsurance Dispute Over Large Asbestos Settlement

Yesterday, the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of New York granted summary judgment to the primary insurer of a pump manufacturer in a dispute with the primary insurer’s reinsurer.  Beginning in 1997, more than 140,000 claims were filed against the pump manufacturer alleging asbestos-related bodily injuries.  In two separate cases, one in California and one in New...

Fifth Circuit Finds Two “Occurrences” In Rejecting Rig Owner’s Insurance Claim

On Tuesday, the Fifth Circuit affirmed a judgment for the insurers of a drilling rig that rejected a claim from the rig owner for approximately $17 million in losses.  Following a storm in February 2010, a jack-up drilling rig encountered severe weather and the rough seas caused the rig’s legs to become misaligned, which added to the rig’s difficulties caused by twenty...

Wrongful Death Case In Concrete Crushing Machine Incident Remanded To Louisiana Court

Following the death of a Louisiana worker pulled into a concrete crushing machine, the worker’s mother brought suit against a number of entities in state court, some of which were Louisiana companies and some of which were out-of-state entities.  The out-of-state entities, including the manufacturer of the machine, removed the case to federal court on the grounds that the...

« Older Entries